Cancell the lease deed– The Military Estate Officer-the writ-respondent No.2 executed the lease deed in question on behalf of the President and thus rightly hold that the respondent No.2 being not the lessor, the lessor being the President of Bangladesh the respondent No.2 had no right to cancell the lease in question– The High Court Division, on examination of the lease deed in question and other papers filed by the parties, found out that the Military Estate Officer-the writ-respondent No.2 executed the lease deed in question (annexure-A) on behalf of the President and thus rightly hold that the respondent No.2 being not the lessor, the lessor being the President of Bangladesh the respondent No.2 had no right to cancell the lease in question; the High Court Division rightly found also that the right of cancellation and entry has been reversed by lease deed itself to the lessor and the lessor includes his successors and assigns and that the writ-respondent No.2-the Military Estate Officer is not the successor or assign of the President.
Appellate Division finds that the High Court Division, on meticulous examination and consideration of all aspects, rightly held that the impugned cancellation order-the annexure-L of the perpetual lease-the annexure-A-has been issued by the respondent No.2 without any lawful authority. ...Government of Bangladesh =VS= Chattagram Zila Krira Sangstha, (Civil), 2021(2) [11 LM (AD) 539] ....View Full Judgment