Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of Bangladesh (AD & HCD)
Corporation’s Employees Service Regulation, 1989 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Section/Order/ Article/Rule/ Regulation | Head Note | Parties Name | Reference/Citation |
Regulation 50 |
Payment of gratuity– Impugned Office Order can not supersede the
statutory provision– The appellants and the employees of other
Corporations are similarly circumstanced and there is no reason to
discriminate them in the enjoyment of gratuity similar to those who have
been enjoying as such. These appellants are doing similar work as those
employees mentioned above and we find no reason to discriminate them with
regard to the enjoyment of gratuity.
|
Obaidul Islam Chowdhury =VS= Bangladesh | 9 LM (AD) 39 |