Under Section 4 of the aforesaid order, the lessee is not entitled to hold over after the expiry of the period of lease. Farid Miah Vs. Kutubuddin being dead, his hears: Shanu Begum and others, 14 BLD (AD) 26.

Release—When the Custodian. Enemy Property released the property on the ground that the same is not Enemy Property he could not direct the tenant to handover the property to a person whose title is denied by the owner. Mst. Aftabunessa Vs. Md. Shamsul I-faq Taiukder, 4 BLD (AD) 273

Premises Rent Control Act, 1991
Section 2, 33
Enemy Property (Lands and Buildings) Administration and Disposal Order, 1966
The revisional Court acted beyond its jurisdiction in setting aside the concurrent finding of fact both the trial and the Appellate Court– Both the trial Court and the Appellate Court after due consideration of the materials on record came to concurrent findings that the plaintiff-appellant failed to establish the existence of the landlord and tenant relationship in between them since there is neither any positive evidence to such fact nor there is any allegation of the case of holding over after demise of landlord, Dhirendra Nath Sen and Shibsankar Mitra, the predecessor of the plaintiff. Thus, the revisional Court acted beyond its jurisdiction in setting aside the concurrent finding of fact and there is misreading and misappreciation of the evidence on record regarding fact of the case. Consequently, the judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and thereby the concurrent finding and decision of the two Courts below are restored. ...Sangit Parishad, Chittagong =VS= Prabir Dutta, (Civil), 2021(2) [11 LM (AD) 618] ....View Full Judgment