Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of Bangladesh (AD & HCD)
Chittagong Port Authority Ordinance, 1976 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Section/Order/ Article/Rule/ Regulation | Head Note | Parties Name | Reference/Citation |
Section 19 |
The Admiralty Judge, in allowing the vessel to have the territorial waters of Bangladesh without payment of her dues payable to the Chittagong Port Authority, travelled beyond his jurisdiction. Chairman Chittagong Port Authority & another vs Ministry of Defence and others 49 DLR (AD) 152. |
Chairman Chittagong Port Authority & another vs Ministry of Defence and others | 49 DLR (AD) 152 |
Section 49 |
Notice– In the plaint, there is an averment that notice under section 49
of the Chittagong Port Authority Ordinance had been served. When there is
clear assertion in the plaint itself that notice under section 49 of the
Ordinance was served upon the Chittagong Port Authority, it could not be
said that the suit is barred by law as envisaged in clause (d) of rule 11
of Order VII of the Code of Civil Procedure.
|
Abdur Razzak Dobhash =VS= Ali Murtaza Dobhash | 9 LM (AD) 79 |
section 49 |
Purpose of serving notice prior to the institution of the suit under
section 49 of the Chittagong Port Ordinance, 1976:
|
Chattogram Port Authority Vs. Md. Mehedi Hasan | 17 SCOB [2023] HCD 34 |