Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of Bangladesh (AD & HCD)
Warrant of Precedence of 1975 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Section/Order/ Article/Rule/ Regulation | Head Note | Parties Name | Reference/Citation |
Civil awards holders and holders of gallantry awards of Bir Uttam should be included in the Warrant of Precedence: The Warrant of Precedence of the neighbouring countries include the holders of highest civil awards, however the impugned Warrant of Precedence of our country does not include such dignitaries, who are not constitutional or public functionaries. As such, it is expected that those dignitaries who have been honoured or decorated with civil awards, e.i., Shadhinata Padak, or Ekhushey Padak, and those valiant freedom fighters who have been honoured with gallantry awards of Bir Uttam should be included in the Table of the impugned Warrant of Precedence in such order as deemed appropriate. …Bangladesh Vs. Md. Ataur Rahman & ors., (Civil), 9 SCOB [2017] AD 1 ....View Full Judgment |
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Ataur Rahman & ors. | 9 SCOB [2017] AD 1 | |
The impugned Warrant of Precedence... |
The impugned Warrant of Precedence being based on utter irrationality and
arbitrariness is to be modified and amended in the following manner:
|
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Ataur Rahman & ors. | 9 SCOB [2017] AD 1 |
Included in the Warrant of Precedence– |
Civil awards holders and holders of gallantry awards of Bir Uttam should be
included in the Warrant of Precedence–
|
Bangladesh =VS= Md. Ataur Rahman | 4 LM (AD) 40 |
Warrant of Precedence |
The impugned Warrant of Precedence being based on utter irrationality and
arbitrariness is to be modified and amended in the following manner–
|
Bangladesh =VS= Md. Ataur Rahman | 4 LM (AD) 40 |