MPO–
Teachers and staffs of the Non-Government Schools and Colleges could not claim the MPO scheme enlistment as a matter of right– In Abdur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh 10 BLC (AD) 179 held that “Mandamus may be issue where there is a violation of a legal right or violation of a legal duty. The writ petitioners did not allege that the writ respondents have violated any legal right of them. The granting of MPO is the policy decision of the Government. Therefore, the petitioners could not claim the same as of right. Appellate Division is of the view that teachers and staffs of the Non-Government Schools and Colleges could not claim the MPO scheme enlistment as a matter of right and, as such, direction could not be given unless there is infringement of legal right or violation of law. This Division is of the considered view that the instant writ petition is not maintainable. This Division finds merit in the petition, however, this Division is not inclined to grant leave, rather, dispose of the instant Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal as the writ petition was not maintainable. This petition is disposed of. The judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. This judgment will not stand as bar against the concerned authority to include any post of School/College in the Monthly Payment Order MPO in accordance with law. .....Ministry of Education, Bangladesh =VS= Ishmat Ara Jahan, (Civil), 2022(1) [12 LM (AD) 290] ....View Full Judgment

M.P.O./ MPO/ Monthly Pay Order: M.P.O.–– The granting of M.P.O. is the policy decision of the Government. Therefore, the petitioners could not claim the same as of right unless infringement of legal right or violation of law–– The granting of M.P.O. is the policy decision of the Government. Therefore, the petitioners could not claim the same as of right. This Division is of the view that teachers and staffs of the Non-Government School and College could not claim the M.P.O. as a matter of right and as such, direction could not be given unless infringement of legal right or violation of law.
We are of the considered view that the instant writ petition is not maintainable. We find merit in the petition, however, we are not inclined to grant leave, rather, dispose of the instant Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal as the writ petition was not maintainable. …Government of Bangladesh =VS= Md. Nazrul Islam, [7 LM (AD) 208] ....View Full Judgment

M.P.O–– Striking out the name of the writ-petitioner from the list of Monthly Payment Order (M.P.O.)–– Before delisting the name of respondent No.1 from the list of M.P.O., no notice for showing cause was served upon her and as such, the principle of natural justice has been violated. Therefore, the High Court Division rightly declared the action illegal. This civil appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. ...Ministry of Education, BD =VS= Mrs. Kanij Salma, Lecturer, [10 LM (AD) 199] ....View Full Judgment

M.P.O–– Monthly Pay Order (MPO) (government portion of the salary–– The High Court Division directed the leave-petitioners to settle the index number of the writ-petitioner’s Monthly Pay Order (MPO)and to pay the writ-petitioner’s earlier MPO with effect from 14.10.2004 within 3 (three) months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment and order of the High Court Division. The findings arrived at and the decision made by the High Court Division having been based on proper appreciation of law and fact do not call for interference. Accordingly, this civil petition is dismissed. .....Ministry of Education =VS= Md. Zahurul Haque, [3 LM (AD) 272] ....View Full Judgment

MPO–
The granting of MPO is the policy decision of the Government. The petitioners could not claim the same as of right– In the case in hand, the petitioners did not allege that the writ-respondents have violated any legal right of them. The granting of MPO is the policy decision of the Government. Therefore, the petitioners could not claim the same as of right. This Division is of the view that teachers and staffs of the Non-Government School and College could not claim the MPO as a matter of right and as such, direction could not be given unless infringement of legal right or violation of law. .....Government of Bangladesh =VS= Md. Mainul Haque, (Civil), 2022(1) [12 LM (AD) 345] ....View Full Judgment