Details |
M.P.O.– The granting of M.P.O. is the policy decision of the Government.
Therefore, the petitioners could not claim the same as of right unless
infringement of legal right or violation of law–
The granting of M.P.O. is the policy decision of the Government. Therefore,
the petitioners could not claim the same as of right. This Division is of
the view that teachers and staffs of the Non-Government School and College
could not claim the M.P.O. as a matter of right and as such, direction
could not be given unless infringement of legal right or violation of law.
We are of the considered view that the instant writ petition is not
maintainable. We find merit in the petition, however, we are not inclined
to grant leave, rather, dispose of the instant Civil Petition for Leave to
Appeal as the writ petition was not maintainable. …Government of
Bangladesh =VS= Md. Nazrul Islam, (Civil), 2019 (2) [7 LM (AD) 208] ....View Full Judgment
M.P.O–
Striking out the name of the writ-petitioner from the list of Monthly
Payment Order (M.P.O.)– Before delisting the name of respondent No.1 from
the list of M.P.O., no notice for showing cause was served upon her and as
such, the principle of natural justice has been violated. Therefore, the
High Court Division rightly declared the action illegal. This civil appeal
is dismissed without any order as to costs. ...Ministry of Education, BD
=VS= Mrs. Kanij Salma, Lecturer, (Civil), 2021(1) [10 LM (AD) 199] ....View Full Judgment
|