M.P.O.– The granting of M.P.O. is the policy decision of the Government. Therefore, the petitioners could not claim the same as of right unless infringement of legal right or violation of law–
The granting of M.P.O. is the policy decision of the Government. Therefore, the petitioners could not claim the same as of right. This Division is of the view that teachers and staffs of the Non-Government School and College could not claim the M.P.O. as a matter of right and as such, direction could not be given unless infringement of legal right or violation of law.
We are of the considered view that the instant writ petition is not maintainable. We find merit in the petition, however, we are not inclined to grant leave, rather, dispose of the instant Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal as the writ petition was not maintainable. …Government of Bangladesh =VS= Md. Nazrul Islam, (Civil), 2019 (2) [7 LM (AD) 208] ....View Full Judgment

M.P.O–
Striking out the name of the writ-petitioner from the list of Monthly Payment Order (M.P.O.)– Before delisting the name of respondent No.1 from the list of M.P.O., no notice for showing cause was served upon her and as such, the principle of natural justice has been violated. Therefore, the High Court Division rightly declared the action illegal. This civil appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. ...Ministry of Education, BD =VS= Mrs. Kanij Salma, Lecturer, (Civil), 2021(1) [10 LM (AD) 199] ....View Full Judgment