The High Court Division was not also factually correct in finding that summons of the suit was not served upon defendant No.3, as report of the process server clearly showed that summons of the suit was served upon defendant No.3 by hanging and he gave report to that effect. Merely because the fact of service of summons upon defendant No.3 was not recorded in the order sheet, it may be through inadvertence which did not make the report of the process server as regards service of summons upon defendant No.3 ineffective or nonest. .....Rasheda Begum & others =VS= Abul Hashem & others, (Civil), 2016-[1 LM (AD) 243] ....View Full Judgment