The Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984
Article 79, 129(g)
The Evidence Act, 1872
Section 68
Sold the Land–– The sale was admitted/not denied by the two sellers who had a two-third share in the said land and the third seller did not come forward to testify. Apparently, the plaintiff’s husband was interested in the land and he had himself also filed the suit. The learned Additional District Judge, Swabi in setting aside the judgment and decree of the learned Civil Judge, Swabi was guided by correct legal principles and the judgment in appeal ought not to have been set aside in revision and that too on the mistaken ground that the sale was not established by disregarding the aforesaid facts.–– Therefore, for the foregoing reasons, this appeal is allowed, the impugned judgment is set aside and the suit filed by the respondent No. 1 is dismissed. Since two judgments were passed in favour of the respondent No.1, there shall be no order as to cost. .....Jehangir =VS= Mst. Shams Sultana, (Civil), 2022(2) [13 LM (SC) 14] ....View Full Judgment