Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of Pakistan
Mahomedan Law/ Muslim Law/ Principles Mohammedan Law (Pakistan) |
Section/Order/ Article/Rule/ Regulation |
Head Note |
Parties Name |
Reference/Citation |
Paragraph 220
|
Appointed sajjadanashin–
Dewan Qutab-ud-Din had never appointed the appellant as sajjadanashin and
it is also conceded by him that per the custom and also a history of over
seven hundred years of the shrine, the nomination of the successor is
always the absolute discretion of sajjadanashin holding the post. In the
absence of any written evidence of the same and the fact that the
respondent has successfully been able to prove his case through witness
statements and documentary evidence produced, the express nomination by the
late sajjadanashin Dewan Qutab-ud-Din is the only conclusive factor of
determining the entitlement of sajjadanashinship of the shrine of Baba
Farid (RA). We have considered the judgment of the learned High Court which
is quite elaborate, each and every aspect of the matter has been taken into
consideration and on the basis of proper reading and appreciation of the
evidence: factual finding has been given by the learned High Court
affirming the finding already given by the learned Appellate Court.
.....Al-Haj Deewan Bakhtiyar Syed Muhammad =VS= Deewan Maudood Masood,
(Civil), 2018 (1) [4 LM (SC) 123] ....View Full Judgment
|
Al-Haj Deewan Bakhtiyar Syed Muhammad =VS= Deewan Maudood Masood |
4 LM (SC) 123 |