Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of India
|
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (India) |
| Section/Order/ Article/Rule/ Regulation |
Head Note |
Parties Name |
Reference/Citation |
|
Section 25F
|
Worker benefits–
It is an admitted position that though the appellant worked as such till
1991 under different work/schemes i.e. Rabi and Kharif and completed 240
days in a calendar year only during the years 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1986 to
1989 but he worked only for 195 days in the year 1990 and 19.5 days in the
immediate preceding year of his dismissal which is below the required 240
days of working in the period of 12 calendar months preceding the date of
dismissal, therefore, he is not entitled to take the benefits of the
provisions of Section 25F of the Act and Division Bench of the High Court
was right in dismissing the appeal of the present appellant. .....Mohd. Ali
=VS= State of H.P., (Civil), 2018 (2) [5 LM (SC) 57] ....View Full Judgment
|
Mohd. Ali =VS= State of H.P. |
5 LM (SC) 57 |