Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of India
| Copyright Act, 1957 (India) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Section/Order/ Article/Rule/ Regulation | Head Note | Parties Name | Reference/Citation |
| Sections 63, 64 and 65 |
Only in a case where the offence is punishable for imprisonment for less than three years or with fine only the offence can be said to be non-cognizable– The High Court has committed a grave error in holding that the offence under Section 63 of the Copyright Act is a non-cognizable offence. Thereby the High Court has committed a grave error in quashing and setting aside the criminal proceedings and the FIR. Therefore, the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court quashing and setting aside the criminal proceedings/FIR under Section 63 of the Copyright Act deserves to be quashed and set aside. It is observed and held that offence under Section 63 of the Copyright Act is a cognizable and non-bailable offence. Consequently, the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court taking a contrary view is hereby quashed and set aside and the criminal proceedings against respondent no.2 for the offence under Sections 63 & 64 of the Copyright Act now shall be proceeded further in accordance with law and on its own merits treating the same as a cognizable and non-bailable offence. .....M/s Knit Pro International =VS= The State of NCT of Delhi, (Criminal), 2022(1) [12 LM (SC) 7] ....View Full Judgment |
M/s Knit Pro International =VS= The State of NCT of Delhi | 12 LM (SC) 7 |