Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of India
|
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 |
| Section/Order/ Article/Rule/ Regulation |
Head Note |
Parties Name |
Reference/Citation |
|
Section 14(1)(e)
|
Eviction in the suit shop–
The appellants are directed to deposit the entire arrears of rent
payable from the date of application filed by respondent No.1 for
their eviction and continue to deposit the monthly rent on or before 15th
of each month at the rate determined by the High Court till final orders
are passed by the Rent Controlling Authority. Failure to deposit
the arrears including monthly rent, as directed herein, would result
in refusal to contest the eviction proceedings. .....Vijay Kumar
Ahluwalia =VS= Bishan Chand Maheshwari, (Civil), 2017 (2)– [3 LM (SC) 50] ....View Full Judgment
|
Vijay Kumar Ahluwalia =VS= Bishan Chand Maheshwari |
3 LM (SC) 50 |
|
Order I Rule 10
|
Power under Order I, Rule 10 suo motu invoked–
Power under Order I, Rule 10 suo motu invoked by us, it is not necessary
for the parties to file separate application, since we have ourselves
impleaded the firm and the partners in the proceedings. We direct all
the parties to appear before the Rent Controller, Delhi on 1.3.2017.
Within two weeks from today, the respondents will file an amended memo of
parties before the Rent Controller. The additionally impleaded
respondents, if they chose to file written statement, will file it
either jointly or individually, within a period of thirty days from
today. .....Richard Lee =VS= Girish Soni, (Civil), 2017 (2)– [3 LM (SC)
38] ....View Full Judgment
|
Richard Lee =VS= Girish Soni |
3 LM (SC) 38 |