Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of India
|
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (India) |
| Section/Order/ Article/Rule/ Regulation |
Head Note |
Parties Name |
Reference/Citation |
|
Section 2(b)
|
The Court is bound to explain as to why the apology should not be
accepted–
Apology becomes relevant. The appellant has tendered an unconditional
apology for bona fide exercise of his powers as an Investigating Officer.
Apology is one of the defences in the case of a civil contempt and the
Court is bound to explain as to why the apology should not be accepted. The
facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that the apology
tendered by the appellant has to be accepted. .....Satwant Singh =VS=
Malkeet Singh, (Civil), 2017 (2)– [3 LM (SC) 41] ....View Full Judgment
|
Satwant Singh =VS= Malkeet Singh |
3 LM (SC) 41 |