Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of India
|
Arms Act, 1959 (India) |
| Section/Order/ Article/Rule/ Regulation |
Head Note |
Parties Name |
Reference/Citation |
|
Section 25
|
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 302/34 r/w
The Arms Act, 1959
Section 25
The charge of offence not proved beyond reasonable doubt– We find that
the trial court as well as the High Court has erred in law in holding
that the charge against the two accused stood proved. We are of the
opinion that the prosecution has failed to prove the charge of offence
punishable under Section 302/34 IPC against the two accused. We further
hold that the charge of offence punishable under Section 25 of the Arms
Act, 1959 against accused Ajit @ Dara Singh is also not proved beyond
reasonable doubt. .....Pawan =VS= State of Haryana, [3 LM (SC) 71] ....View Full Judgment
|
Pawan =VS= State of Haryana |
3 LM (SC) 71 |
|
Section 25 (1) (a) & 25 (1AA) read with Sec. 35
|
The Accused in jail it is not possible to hold that he was in joint
occupation of the house–
Set aside the conviction of Mohmed Rafiq Abdul Rahim Shaikh (A-4) under
Section 25 (1) (a) & 25 (1AA) read with Section 35 of the Arms Act, 1959.
Since the Accused was in jail it is not possible to hold that he was in
joint occupation of the house in accordance to Section 35 of the Arms Act,
1959. .....Mohmed Rafiq Abdul Rahim Shaikh =VS= State of Gujarat,
(Criminal), 2018 (2) [5 LM (SC) 91] ....View Full Judgment
|
Mohmed Rafiq Abdul Rahim Shaikh =VS= State of Gujarat |
5 LM (SC) 91 |