Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of Bangladesh (HCD)
Securities and Exchange Ordinance, 1969 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Section/Order/ Article/Rule/ Regulation | Head Note | Parties Name | Reference/Citation |
Section 17 |
In the instant case, after following due process of law and the principle of national Justice i.e. show cause notice was issued to the petitioner to explain his position, opportunity was also given for personal hearing before the penal order was passed. Moreover, the penal order has been passed elaborately considering the materials on record i.e. the confessional statement and explanation of the petitioner, the investigation report and the evidence on record. The said order has been affirmed by the quasi judicial body in revision/review. ...Md. Nur Islam Vs. Securities and Exchange Commission & ors., (Civil), 9 SCOB [2017] HCD 6 ....View Full Judgment |
Md. Nur Islam Vs. Securities and Exchange Commission & ors. | 9 SCOB [2017] HCD 6 |
Section 26 |
On consideration of the materials on record, it appears to us that the impugned order dated o8. 12. 2011 can not be said to be unlawful merely because it is without elaborate reasoning and non-speaking one. The impugned order appears to be otherwise sustainable. ...Md. Nur Islam Vs. Securities and Exchange Commission & ors., (Civil), 9 SCOB [2017] HCD 6 ....View Full Judgment |
Md. Nur Islam Vs. Securities and Exchange Commission & ors. | 9 SCOB [2017] HCD 6 |
Section 26 |
Securities and Exchange Ordinance [XVII of 1969]
|
Shamim Ahmed -Vs.- Chairman, Bangladesh Security and Exchange Commission & others | 2019 ALR (HCD) Online 390 |