Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of Bangladesh (AD & HCD)
Land Reforms Ordinance, 1984 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Section/Order/ Article/Rule/ Regulation | Head Note | Parties Name | Reference/Citation |
Section 5 |
The words ‘immoveable property’ occurring in section 5 of the Ordinance include both agricultural and non-agricultural properties. There is no scope for encroaching upon the domain of legislature by importing the words ‘rural area’ in section 5 and addition of such words will amount to legislation by the judiciary which is not at all permissible. .....S. N. Kabir =VS= Fatema Begum & others, (Civil), 2016-[1 LM (AD) 401] ....View Full Judgment |
S. N. Kabir =VS= Fatema Begum & others | 1 LM (AD) 401 |
Section 5 |
The words ‘immoveable property’ occurring in section 5 of the Ordinance include both agricultural and non-agricultural properties. There is no scope for encroaching upon the domain of legislature by importing the words ‘rural area’ in section 5 and addition of such words will amount to legislation by the judiciary which is not at all permissible. …S. N. Kabir.vs. Fatema Begum & ors, (Civil), 3 SCOB [2015] AD 16 ....View Full Judgment |
S. N. Kabir.vs. Fatema Begum & ors | 3 SCOB [2015] AD 16 |
Section 5 |
Restricts benami transaction—
|
Shah Alam (Md.) Vs. Md. Omar Farooq and others | 12 MLR (AD) 268 |
Section 5 |
Dispute or appeal relating to non-agricultural
|
Ayen All Howlader Vs. Nazir Ahmed and others | 13 MLR (AD) 225 |
Section 5 |
Benami purchase–– The plaintiff purchased the suit land in the ‘benami’ of the defendant in the year 1952 and since then he has been possessing the suit land and there did not arise any cause for declaration of the defendant as the ‘benamder’ of the plaintiff in respect of the suit land. Only when the defendant claimed ownership in the suit land the cause of action arose for the plaintiff to get the suit land in his name by declaring the defendant as his ‘benamder’. The plaintiff filed this suit within the statutory period of limitation after the cause of action arose. So, this suit is not barred by limitation. The impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division be set aside and the judgment and decree of the appellate court below be restored. ...Maseeh Ahmed =VS= Mosammat Asma Khatun, (Civil), 2021(2) [11 LM (AD) 555] ....View Full Judgment |
||
Section 6 |
Gives protection to the owners of the homestead in the rural area from
eviction—
|
Abdul Hai and another Vs. Chan Banu Bibi | 13 MLR (AD) 140 |
On perusal of the oral |
Land Reforms Ordinance, 1984
|
Mahmud N. A. Khan & ors Vs. Md. Kamrul Islam Khan & ors | 19 SCOB [2024] HCD 165 |