|
Bangladesh Labour Act, 2006
Section 303 (umo)
Labour Welfare Foundation Law, 2006
In view of specific allegations that the petitioners intentionally failed
to create, maintain and send to the complainant the registers of leave,
register of daily attendance, the register of overtime of the labourer and
employees and register of works, we are unable to find any prima facie
substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioners
that the framing of the charge under section 303 (umo) of Act No.42 of 2006
against the petitioners is without any lawful basis. ...Prof. Dr. Muhammad
Yunus & ors Vs. The State & anr, (Criminal), 18 SCOB [2023] HCD 275
....View Full Judgment
|
Prof. Dr. Muhammad Yunus & ors Vs. The State & anr |
18 SCOB [2023] HCD 275 |
|
Bangladesh Labour Act, 2006
Section 4, 117, 234 and 319(5)
Labour Welfare Foundation Law, 2006
It is admitted that at the instance of the Collective Bargaining Agent of
the Employees and Labour Union of the GTC Industrial Dispute Case No.1666
of 2019 has been filed and the same is still pending in the Labour Court
for final settlement. But the learned Advocate for the petitioners could
not show us any law which prevents the inspection of the GTC by an
authorized Inspector and lodging of a complaint for violations of some
provisions of Act No.42 of 2006 during pendency of above Industrial Dispute
Case. As mentioned above this complaint has been filed under section 319(5)
of Act No.42 of 2006 by an authorized Inspector alleging repeated
violations of provisions of section 4, 117 and 234 of above Act by the GTC
which is an important actor working in the telecommunication sector of
Bangladesh. The petitioners are Chairman, Managing Director and Directors
of the GTC. This is not a criminal case under the Penal Code instituted by
a law of enforcement agency. On consideration of above materials on record
we are unable to find any substances in the submissions of the learned
Advocate for the petitioners that this case has been falsely instituted to
tarnish the internationally acclaimed personality of petitioner No.1 who is
a Nobel lauriate. ...Prof. Dr. Muhammad Yunus & ors Vs. The State & anr,
(Criminal), 18 SCOB [2023] HCD 275
....View Full Judgment
|
Prof. Dr. Muhammad Yunus & ors Vs. The State & anr |
18 SCOB [2023] HCD 275 |