Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of Bangladesh (AD & HCD)



Labour Welfare Foundation Law, 2006
Section/Order/ Article/Rule/ Regulation Head Note Parties Name Reference/Citation

Bangladesh Labour Act, 2006
Section 303 (umo)
Labour Welfare Foundation Law, 2006
In view of specific allegations that the petitioners intentionally failed to create, maintain and send to the complainant the registers of leave, register of daily attendance, the register of overtime of the labourer and employees and register of works, we are unable to find any prima facie substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioners that the framing of the charge under section 303 (umo) of Act No.42 of 2006 against the petitioners is without any lawful basis. ...Prof. Dr. Muhammad Yunus & ors Vs. The State & anr, (Criminal), 18 SCOB [2023] HCD 275 ....View Full Judgment

Prof. Dr. Muhammad Yunus & ors Vs. The State & anr 18 SCOB [2023] HCD 275

Bangladesh Labour Act, 2006
Section 4, 117, 234 and 319(5)
Labour Welfare Foundation Law, 2006
It is admitted that at the instance of the Collective Bargaining Agent of the Employees and Labour Union of the GTC Industrial Dispute Case No.1666 of 2019 has been filed and the same is still pending in the Labour Court for final settlement. But the learned Advocate for the petitioners could not show us any law which prevents the inspection of the GTC by an authorized Inspector and lodging of a complaint for violations of some provisions of Act No.42 of 2006 during pendency of above Industrial Dispute Case. As mentioned above this complaint has been filed under section 319(5) of Act No.42 of 2006 by an authorized Inspector alleging repeated violations of provisions of section 4, 117 and 234 of above Act by the GTC which is an important actor working in the telecommunication sector of Bangladesh. The petitioners are Chairman, Managing Director and Directors of the GTC. This is not a criminal case under the Penal Code instituted by a law of enforcement agency. On consideration of above materials on record we are unable to find any substances in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioners that this case has been falsely instituted to tarnish the internationally acclaimed personality of petitioner No.1 who is a Nobel lauriate. ...Prof. Dr. Muhammad Yunus & ors Vs. The State & anr, (Criminal), 18 SCOB [2023] HCD 275 ....View Full Judgment

Prof. Dr. Muhammad Yunus & ors Vs. The State & anr 18 SCOB [2023] HCD 275