Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of Bangladesh (AD & HCD)
Enquiry Committee and Tribunal (Teachers and Officers) Regulations, 1980 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Section/Order/ Article/Rule/ Regulation | Head Note | Parties Name | Reference/Citation |
Regulation No. 7 |
section 45(5) of the First Statute of the University of Dhaka and Article
52 of the Dhaka University Order, 1973:
|
Samia Rahman Vs. Bangladesh and others | 17 SCOB [2023] HCD 182 |
Regulation No. 7 |
The Tribunal categorically found that the petitioner cannot be made accused for direct plagiarism, but the Syndicate demoted the petitioner for plagiarism which is absolutely baseless and whimsical inasmuch as the Syndicate can only punish someone based on the findings of facts arrived at by the Tribunal. ...Samia Rahman Vs. Bangladesh and others, (Civil), 17 SCOB [2023] HCD 182 ....View Full Judgment |
Samia Rahman Vs. Bangladesh and others | 17 SCOB [2023] HCD 182 |
Regulation No. 7 |
The observance of the principles of natural justice is not an idle formality. A meaningful opportunity to defend oneself must be given under any circumstances to its truest sense and, in the instant case, the respondents sought to show ceremonial observance of the principles of the natural justice as an eye wash for an ulterior purpose without affording any real opportunity to the petitioner to defend herself by not furnishing the enquiry report as well as the report of the Tribunal. It appears that the impugned decision of the Syndicate is vitiated by bias and malafide inasmuch as while the petitioner was awarded with a major punishment with the stigma of plagiarism but despite repeated requests, she was not given a copy of the enquiry report. The Syndicate did not care to consider the long delay in completing the enquiry. ...Samia Rahman Vs. Bangladesh and others, (Civil), 17 SCOB [2023] HCD 182 ....View Full Judgment |
Samia Rahman Vs. Bangladesh and others | 17 SCOB [2023] HCD 182 |