Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of Bangladesh (AD & HCD)



Bangladesh Freedom Fighters Welfare Trust Act, 2018
Section/Order/ Article/Rule/ Regulation Head Note Parties Name Reference/Citation
Section 2(11)

Bangladesh Freedom Fighters Welfare Trust Act, 2018
Section 2(11)
P.O. 94 of 1972
Article 2(h)
Age of freedom fighters;
It is well settled that in exercise of executive functions of the government, the government can issue circulars, notifications, paripatra etc. to keep its work transparent. Such notifications or circular etc. may be issued in order to give benefits of the enlisted freedom fighters, which is no doubt an appreciable job by the government. But in doing so, the government cannot amend the parent law, namely the definition of freedom fighter as provided by Article 2(h) of P.O. 94 of 1972.
When parliament itself cannot fix the age of freedom fighters as the fixing of such age of freedom fighters will be contrary to the Speech of Bangabandhu and the Declaration of Independence by Bangabandhu, which are part of the Constitution, the same Parliament cannot empower the government to fix such age. On this very simple ground, this empowerment “উক্ত সময়ে যাহাদের বয়স সরকার কর্তৃক নির্ধারিত বয়স সীমার মধ্যে” as incorporated in the definition of ‘বীর মুক্তিযোদ্ধা’ under section 2(11) of the Bangladesh Freedom Fighters Welfare Trust Act, 2018 (Act No.51 of 2018), has become untra-vires the Constitution.
It has long been decided by various judicial pronouncements that which you cannot do directly, you cannot do the same indirectly. As stated above, when the Parliament itself cannot fix the age of the freedom fighters even by enactment of law without amending the Constitution, it cannot empower anybody including the government to fix such age of freedom fighters. ...S.M. Sajjad Hossain Vs. Govt of Bangladesh & ors., (Civil), 13 SCOB [2020] HCD 137 ....View Full Judgment

S.M. Sajjad Hossain Vs. Govt of Bangladesh & ors. 13 SCOB [2020] HCD 137