Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of Bangladesh (AD & HCD)



Trade Organization Ordinance, 1961
Section/Order/ Article/Rule/ Regulation Head Note Parties Name Reference/Citation
Section 3(2)(d)

The Trade Organization Ordinance, 1961
Section 3(2)(d)
The Trade Organizations Rules 1994
Rule 3(7)
Granting of license–– The concerned notices were not published in any national daily newspapers recognized by persons of ordinary prudence and the aforesaid objection was not considered, these vitiated the whole process of licensing. Because, here licensing authority did not comply with the procedure established by law, did not act in accordance with the provisions of law, acted malafide and violated principles of natural justice. If it’s so, then established principle of law is that even if there is a ouster/non-obstante clause in any law, yet court has ample jurisdiction to review judicially whether the authority followed established principle of law or not. ––Appellate Division finds that the impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division does not call for any interference. In the result, this Civil Appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. .....Bangladesh Gayan-O-Srijonshil Prokashak Samity =VS= Bangladesh Publisher & Book Seller Association, (Civil), 2022(2) [13 LM (AD) 605] ....View Full Judgment

Bangladesh Gayan-O-Srijonshil Prokashak Samity =VS= Bangladesh Publisher & Book Seller Association 13 LM (AD) 605