It has been well proved that the plaintiffs have right, title and possession in the suit property. The suit property though was vested and non-resident property–
Considering the above stated facts, circumstances and the evidence on record Appellate Division finds that in this suit it has been well proved that the plaintiffs have right, title and possession in the suit property. The suit property though was vested and non-resident property, but no more it remained so after its transfer, firstly to the Jute Trading Corporation and thereafter to the plaintiffs. The High Court Division, evidently, did not consider all these facts, circumstances and the evidence on record and consequently committed wrong in dismissing the suit of the plaintiffs on the finding only that the suit property was not mentioned in the purchase deed of Jute Trading Corporation. The impugned judgment and decree of the High Court Division, therefore, cannot be sustained. In the circumstances this appeal is allowed on contest without any order as to cost. The impugned judgment and decree of the High Court Division is set aside and those of the trial court be restored. ...M. A. Wahab =VS= ADC (Revenue) Narayanganj, (Civil), 2021(2) [11 LM (AD) 7] ....View Full Judgment