Section 11
|
By virtue of Article 5 of the High Court (Bengal) Order, 1947 in regard to
the territories now known as East Pakistan, the High Court of Dacca is
vested with the same jurisdiction, original and appellate, which was before
the partition exercisable by the High Court at Calcutta.
At the time of partition, there was in the Calcutta High Court, no
insolvency jurisdiction, of an original character, in respect of any area
now f. - within the Province of East Pakistan. Consequently by the effect
of the High Courts (Bengal) Order, 1947, no original insolvency
jurisdiction under the Act of 1909 became vested in the High Court of East
Pakistan at Dacca.
But whereas provision has been made with regard to the Capital of
Federation by specifying the limits of its ordinary original civil
jurisdiction the High Court of East Pakistan at Dacca does not possess any
ordinary original civil jurisdiction for the simple reason that no limits
within which such jurisdiction may be exercised have ever been prescribed
by competent legislative authority in respect of that High Court.
That being the case where an application is made by creditors for the
declaration as insolvent of a person resident in the town of Dacca, the
consequences are that by virtue of the amendment made in the Provincial
Insolvency Act, die District Judge of Dacca has no jurisdiction in the
case, and equally by virtue of the fact that no limits have been fixed for
the ordinary original civil jurisdiction of the High Court of East
Pakistan, that High Court also has no original jurisdiction to deal with
the application.
Abdus Sattar Vs. Arang Limited (1965) 17 DLR (SC) 147.
|
Abdus Sattar Vs. Arang Limited |
17 DLR (SC) 147 |