Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of Bangladesh (AD & HCD)
Enemy Property (Continuance of Emergency Provision) Ordinance [I of 1969] | |||
---|---|---|---|
Section/Order/ Article/Rule/ Regulation | Head Note | Parties Name | Reference/Citation |
Section 2 |
Since the law of enemy property itself died with the repeal of Ordinance No. 1 of 1969 on 23–3–1974 no further Vested Property case can be started thereafter on the basis of the law which is already dead. Aroti Rani Paul vs Sudarshan Kumar Paul and others 56 DLR (AD) 73. |
Aroti Rani Paul vs Sudarshan Kumar Paul and others | 56 DLR (AD) 73 |
Section 3 |
Ordinance No. 1 of 1969 w315 repealed by Ordinance No. 4of1974. The Enemy Property vested in the Custodian has been vested in the Government by repeal of rule 182 of Defence of Pakistan Rules by Ordinance No. 4 of 1974. Rahima Akhter vs AK Bose 40 DLR (AD) 23. |
Rahima Akhter vs AK Bose | 40 DLR (AD) 23 |
Section 3(1) Clause 4(1) |
Vested Property –Execution of document in an Exchange case. After a deed of settlement was executed by a competent officer of the Government whether it could take the plea that the officer had acted without its authority–Under the provisions of Act XLV of 1974 a vested property can be transferred by the Government or by such officer as the Government may direct. The Government having directed the ADC (Rev). to take necessary action in the matter and in view of circulars on the subject, there is no room for doubt that the ADC was duly authorised to execute and register the deed of settlement. The order setting aside the deed is therefore without lawful authority. Muzaffar Ali vs Bangladesh 43 DLR (AD) 137. |
Muzaffar Ali vs Bangladesh | 43 DLR (AD) 137 |
Enemy Property (Continuance of Emergency Provisions) Ordinance I of 1969–
(Continuance of Emergency Provisions) (Repeal) Ordinance–Repeal Act XLV
of 1974– Ordinance 93 of 1976. All Enemy Property vested in the Custodian
is vested in Government.
|
Priyatosh Talukder vs Asstt. Custodian | 39 DLR (AD) 178 | |
By the amendment of section 3 of Act No. 45 of 1974 the entire complexion
of enemy property was changed and power was given for disposal or transfer
to the government vide section 2 of Ordinance No. 93of1976.
|
Rahima Akhter vs AK Bose | 40 DLR (AD) 23 |