Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of Bangladesh (AD & HCD)
Civil Courts Act (XII of 1887) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Section/Order/ Article/Rule/ Regulation | Head Note | Parties Name | Reference/Citation |
Sections 4 and 25 |
Small Cause Court—Jurisdiction of—Whether small cause suits can be
tried by the presiding officer of a Court without being specifically
empowered by notification to exercise Small Cause Court
jurisdiction—Whether Small Cause Court jurisdiction is automatically
vested in a Court— Government has been empowered to invest Subordinate
Judges and Munsifs with Small Cause Court jurisdiction but that has to be
|
Khalilur Rahman Vs. Md. Saidur Rahman; | 6 BLD (AD) 303 |
Sections 8,11,19 and 21 |
The Full Bench considering sections 6, 22, 24 and Order XLVIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, section 8 of the Suit Valuation Act, 1887 as amended by the Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 2001, sections 8,11,19 and 21 of the Civil Courts Act, 1887 and other relevant provisions of law has come to the conclusion that the District Judge has no jurisdiction to hear the revisional application against the order of the Joint District Judge in a suit the valuation of which is above Tk. 5,00,000 (Taka five lac) and in such matters the revisional application shall lie before the High Court Division under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure. Bangladesh vs AHM Khurshed Ali 13 BLC (AD) 114 |
Bangladesh vs AHM Khurshed Ali | 13 BLC (AD) 114 |
Section 21 |
Appeals to a Dist Judge have been provided from a decree or order of a Subordinate Judge or in some cases from that of a Munsif. Ruhul Amin vs District Judge 38 DLR (AD) 172. |
Ruhul Amin vs District Judge | 38 DLR (AD) 172 |
Jurisdiction of Civil Court— |
Civil Court Act
|
Chand Miah and ohters Vs. Abdur Razzaque Mahmud Chowdhury and others; | 11 BLD (AD) 294 |