Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of Bangladesh (AD & HCD)



Bangladesh Madrasha Education Board (Governing Bodies and Managing Committees) Regulation, 1979
Section/Order/ Article/Rule/ Regulation Head Note Parties Name Reference/Citation
Regulation 43 (8)

Day on which show cause charge sheet was communicated to a delinquent employee of an organization, herein the appellant, the said date is to be excluded since the same is in consonant with the rules of computation of period either for the purpose of limitation of legal pro­ceeding or enquiry before the Tribunal or for the departmental enquiry. Md. Ashequr Rhanian vs B.A.R.l.R.M. Chairman (Md Ruhul Amin, J)(Civil) I ADC 324

Md. Ashequr Rhanian vs B.A.R.l.R.M. Chairman 1 ADC 324
Chairman of the Governing Body–

Chairman of the Governing Body–
Relying upon rule 1.2 (i) the High Court Division held that the memo dated 13.07.2017 issued by respondent No. 3, Registrar nominating leave-petitioner No. 2 (respondent No. 8 in the writ petition), Md. Sanowar Hossain, Member of the Parliament as Chairman of the Governing Body of the Tangail Darul Ulum Kamil Madrasa, Tangail is in violation of principle or spirit as laid down in Writ Petition No. 2043 of 2013. Therefore, the High Court Division declared the memo dated 13.07.2017 issued by respondent No. 3 nominating leave-petitioner No. 2, Md. Sanowar Hossain, Member of Parliament as the Chairman of the Governing Body of the Tangail Darul Ulum Kamil Madrasa, Tangail, is without lawful authority and is of no legal effect. The decision made by the High Court Division having been based on proper appreciation of law and fact do not call for interference. Accordingly, this civil petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. …Tangail Darul Ulum Kamil Madrasa=VS=Amir Kudrat-E-Elahi Khan(Md.), (Civil), 2019 (2) [7 LM (AD) 184] ....View Full Judgment

Tangail Darul Ulum Kamil Madrasa=VS=Amir Kudrat-E-Elahi Khan(Md.) 7 LM (AD) 184

The petitioner described himself incorrectly and unauthorisedly as superinten­dent of the Madrasha without assigning any reason for such finding in view of the facts that the petitioner was appoint­ed as a superintendent of the Madrasha by a duly constituted ad-hoc committee and subsequently he was appointed as principal of the Madrasha by the Managing Committee and that until and unless such appointment is cancelled by competent authority the petitioner's locus standi connot be questioned. Moreover he was duly authorised by the Upazila Nirbahi officer by memo dated 19.05.2002 and so he filed the writ petition legally. Moulana Noor Mohammad -vs-Bangladesh Madrasha Education Board, 2, Orphanaz Road, Bakshi Bazar, Dhaka and others (Amirid Kabir Chowdhury J) (Civil) 3ADC 931

Moulana Noor Mohammad -vs-Bangladesh Madrasha Education Board, 2, Orphanaz Road, Bakshi Bazar, Dhaka and others 3 ADC 931