|
Rule 29 (first schedule)
|
The Carriage by Air (International Convention) Act, 1966
Rule 29(first schedule) Read with
The Limitation Act
Section 29
The High Court Division committed an error of law in holding that the date
on which carriage stopped was the date on which the carrier defendants
admitted its failure to deliver its goods finally and offered payment of
compensation in lieu of the goods. The time for limitation began to run
from the expiry of 7 days after the date on which the goods ought to have
arrived, that is, on 22.01.1999. Since the suit was filed on 24.05.2001
apparently the same was barred by limitation in view of special limitation
provided in Rule 29 of the first schedule of the Carriage by Air
(International Convention) Act, 1966 read with section 29 of the Limitation
Act. .....Biman Bangladesh Airlines =VS= Al Rojoni Enterprise, (Civil),
2018 (1) [4 LM (AD) 95]
....View Full Judgment
|
Biman Bangladesh Airlines =VS= Al Rojoni Enterprise |
4 LM (AD) 95 |
|
Rule 29 of the first schedule
|
Carriage by Air (International Convention) Act, 1966
Rule 29 of the first schedule
Read with section 29 of the Limitation Act:
The High Court Division committed an error of law in holding that the date
on which carriage stopped was the date on which the carrier defendants
admitted its failure to deliver its goods finally and offered payment of
compensation in lieu of the goods. The time for limitation began to run
from the expiry of 7 days after the date on which the goods ought to have
arrived, that is, on 22.01.1999. Since the suit was filed on 24.05.2001
apparently the same was barred by limitation in view of special limitation
provided in Rule 29 of the first schedule of the Carriage by Air
(International Convention) Act, 1966 read with section 29 of the Limitation
Act. …Biman Bangladesh Airlines & ors Vs. Al Rojoni Enterprise, (Civil),
9 SCOB [2017] AD 66
....View Full Judgment
|
Biman Bangladesh Airlines & ors Vs. Al Rojoni Enterprise |
9 SCOB [2017] AD 66 |
