Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of Bangladesh (AD & HCD)
Palli Biddyut Samity Service Code, 1992 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Section/Order/ Article/Rule/ Regulation | Head Note | Parties Name | Reference/Citation |
Rule 38(1) (Ka) (Ga), 39(1)(Kha)(3), 40(3) |
পল্লী বিদ্যুতায়ন বোর্ড আইন,
২০১৩ (Act No.57 of 2013)
|
Md. Mobarak Hossain =VS= Ministry of Power, Bangladesh | 16 LM (AD) 9 |
Article 40 |
The findings of the impugned judgments that According to Article 40 of the Pally Biddut Samity Service Code, the departmental proceedings has to be completed within 90+30 days is not correct as no consequence has been attached thereto and as such, the findings of the impugned judgments as regards Article 40 of the Pally Biddut Samity Service Code shall be deemed to have been expunged. Nilphamari Palli Biddut Samity vs. Md. Jamal Uddin (Syed Mahmud Hossain J) (Civil) 14 ADC 451. |
Nilphamari Palli Biddut Samity vs. Md. Jamal Uddin | 14 ADC 451 |
Rule 54, 55(1) (k) |
From the records it appears that the letter sent by respondent No. 1 was a request for him to be released from service and was not accompanied by any deposit of three months' pay as required by rule 54. Since the authority concerned advised the writ petitioner to take release by depositing the requisite pay and upon obtaining necessary clearance, clearly the resignation letter did not by itself, reach finality. The High Court Division posed the question as to how the Samity could accept the writ petitioner's letter requesting his release as a resignation letter since the preconditions, such as depositing money and taking clearance had not been fulfilled. Palli Biddut Samity Vs. Md. Abu Sayed Bhuyan (Muhammad Imman Ali, J) (Civil) 14 ADC 918 |
Palli Biddut Samity Vs. Md. Abu Sayed Bhuyan | 14 ADC 918 |