Section 17(1) of P.O.94 of 1972
|
Allowance/Bhaata–
We are of the view that the High court Division did not commit any
illegality in passing the impugned judgment and order and as such the
submissions of the learned Advocate for the appellant has no basis. Since
the writ petitioner respondents have admittedly been found to be genuine
wounded/disabled freedom fighters, (whatever might be their category/class)
and since they have been enlisted as recipients of such state
allowance/Bhaata as disabled freedom fighters and since the rate of such
allowance/Bhaata has been enhanced from time to time we are of the view
that the writ petitioners, in all the cases, are entitled to get their
allowances/Bhaatas at the rate which has been enhanced from time to time.
.....Bangladesh Muktijoddha Kallayan Trust =VS= Md. Golam Sarwar, (Civil),
2018 (1) [4 LM (AD) 76]
....View Full Judgment
|
Bangladesh Muktijoddha Kallayan Trust =VS= Md. Golam Sarwar |
4 LM (AD) 76 |