Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of Bangladesh (AD)
Hindu Women Rights to Property Act, 1937 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Section/Order/ Article/Rule/ Regulation | Head Note | Parties Name | Reference/Citation |
Section 3(3) |
A Hindu widow or a Hindu woman having life interest can maintain a suit for
partition:
|
Md. Abdus Sattar Miah =VS= Sreemati Raman Sona Dashya & others | 1 LM (AD) 220 |
Imposition of Cost |
Imposition of Cost
|
Collector of Customs Vs. Shammi Ahmed & Ors. | 7 BLT (AD) 240 |
Interest of Public Revenue |
Interest of Public Revenue
|
Commissioner of Customs & Ors Vs. SARC Enterprise | 7 BLT (AD) 366 |
Hindu Women Rights to Property Act |
Appellate Court failed to consider the legal aspect of the case and had abruptly the finding of the trial Court– The learned Judge of the Single Bench of the High Court Division held the view that the findings arrived at by the trial Court having been rested upon consideration and discussions of the evidence and materials on record and also on a correct and proper analysis of the legal aspect involved in the case but the Appellate Court below failed to consider the above legal aspect of the case and had abruptly allowed the appeal and set-aside the judgment and decree of the trial Court without adverting to the finding of the trial Court which appears to him that those are nothing but misreading and non-consideration and misappreciation of the evidence on record. .....Sree Moti Lata Biswas =VS= Md. Abdul Majid, (Civil), 2022(1) [12 LM (AD) 144] ....View Full Judgment |
Sree Moti Lata Biswas =VS= Md. Abdul Majid | 12 LM (AD) 144 |