Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of Pakistan
State Bank of Pakistan Act, 1956 |
Section/Order/ Article/Rule/ Regulation |
Head Note |
Parties Name |
Reference/Citation |
Section 54
|
The State Bank of Pakistan Act, 1956
Section 54 r/w
The State Bank of Pakistan Officers (Pension-cum-Gratuity) Regulations,
1980
The appellants are retired employees of the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP).
Following the direction of the Federal Government issued on 30.11.1977, SBP
introduced a pension scheme for its employees vide letter dated10.1.1978.
Thereafter, the Central Board of Directors of SBP (Board), in exercise of
its powers under Section 54 of the State Bank of Pakistan Act, 1956 (the
Act), framed the Regulations with the approval of the Federal Government.
The appellants, being aggrieved of SBP’s failure to grant them periodical
increases in pension in line with those granted by the Federal Government
since 1997, filed representations before SBP but to no avail. The
petitioners then filed a constitutional petition before the learned High
Court which (petition) was dismissed vide impugned judgment. A perusal of
the Regulations suggests that they relate to pension and gratuity matters
of the employees of SBP and therefore it can be said that the ambit of such
Regulations is not broader but narrower than the parent statute, i.e. the
Act. Thus the conclusion of the above discussion is that the Regulations
are basically instructions for the internal control or management of SBP
and are therefore non-statutory. Hence the appellants could not invoke the
constitutional jurisdiction of the learned High Court which was correct in
dismissing their writ petition. .....Muhammad Zaman =VS= Pakistan, (Civil),
2017 (2)– [3 LM (SC) 100] ....View Full Judgment
|
Muhammad Zaman =VS= Pakistan |
3 LM (SC) 100 |