Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of Bangladesh
Power Development Board (Employees) Service Rules, 1982 |
Section/Order/Article/Rule/Regulation |
Head Note |
Rule 143
|
Although in sub-rule (2) no authority has been mentioned to whom a written
defence has to be submitted, the written defence has to be submitted to the
enquiry officer appointed to held the enquiry.
Chairman, Power Development Board, Dhaka and others v. Md. Faziul Haque, 22
BLD (AD) 85. ....View Full Judgment
|
Rule 143
|
Power Development Board (Employees) Service Rules, 1932
Rule 143—
In view of rule 143(1)(2) of the Power Development Board (Employees)
Service Rules, 1982, the High Court Division erred in law in holding that
the respondent is entitled to get another show cause notice by the
authority to submit written defence to them as per sub-rule (2) of rule 143
and that not having been given there was gross violation of the said rule.)
But in the facts and circumstances of the case the factual aspect of the
case having been found in favour of the respondent as elaborately discussed
by the High Court Division holding that factually there is no justification
for imposing any penalty on the respondent, in order to secure the interest
of justice and do complete justice the impugned judgment warrants no
interference.
Chairman, Power Development Board vs Md Fazlul Hague 7 BLC (AD) 122. ....View Full Judgment
|