Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of Bangladesh
Bangladesh Civil Service Recruitment Rules, 1981 |
Section/Order/Article/Rule/Regulation |
Head Note |
Rule 4(3) (b)
|
read with
Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Article-27 and Article-29
With a good academic record the writ petitioner-respondent appeared at the
15th Bangladesh Civil Service (BCS) Examination and secured twelfth
position in the merit list and was found fit by the Medical Board but
because of an adverse report by the Special Branch of Police his name was
not published fçr appointment. The police report contained a statement
that his active political involvement with a student organisation he was
not a suitable and fit person for appointment in the police and
administrative cadres—High Court Division’s finding that the Government
is entitled to be satisfied about a candidate possessing a clean record.
Loyalty to the country, personal integrity and discipline and may make
necessary verification but at the same time should always be careful not to
violate one’s fundamental right—Held:
Respondent has been discriminated against and has been denied an equal
opportunity to employment. [Paras-6 & 7]
Bangladesh and Ors. Vs. Gazi Jashimuddir 6 BLT (AD)-209 ....View Full Judgment
|
Rule 8(l)(dd)
|
Exemption from appearing in examination of certain persons held not
unconstitutional —Constitution of Bangladesh —Article 141C(D—
Declaration of emergency by the President suspending the enforcement
offundamental rights is not subject of scrutiny by the court—
The Appellate Division held the High Court Division was wrong in disposing
of the writ petitions seeking enforcement of fundamental rights during the
continuance of the emergency when the fundamental rights were suspended.
Declaration of emergency does not come within the scope of scrutiny by the
court. The apex court held the Rule 8(l)(dd) of the Bangladesh Civil
Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1981 not ultravires of the constitution nor
discriminatory or class legislation. Alaur Rahman (Md.) and others Vs. B.M
Mahibur Rahman and others 14 MLR (2009) (AD) 138. ....View Full Judgment
|