Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of Bangladesh

ALL A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z



মহানগরী, বিভাগীয় শহর ও জেলা শহরের পৌর এলাকাসহ দেশের সকল খেলার মাঠ, ......... সংরক্ষণ আইন, ২০০০
Section/Order/Article/Rule/Regulation Head Note
Section 5

read with
Building Construction Act [II of 1953]
Section 3 —Proof of ownership/title of the applicant over the land in question is a mandatory requirement to obtain sanction of plan from the RAJUK.
The Appellate Division found that the EPB did not acquire title, whatsoever, be-fore handing over the possession of land in question to the BGMEA in 2001 nor it got its name mutated in the record of rights, thus there is a question of vesting title on the BGMEA. As such it has/had no scope of submitting the title documents along with the plan. So there is no scope for the RAJUK to approve or sanction the building construction plan, and RAJUK in its affi-davit stated that it did not finally approve the plan. In this score also the BGMEA building/office Complex has been constructed in violation of the Building Construction Act, 1952.
President, Bangladesh Garments Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA) 23/1 Panthapath Link Road Kawran Bazar Dhaka. -Vs.- Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others. (Civil) 8 ALR (AD) 304-315 ....View Full Judgment