Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of Bangladesh

ALL A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z



স্থানীয় সরকার (ইউনিয়ন পরিষদ) নির্বাচন বিধিমালা, ২০১০
Section/Order/Article/Rule/Regulation Head Note
Rules 90 and 91

No complaint was made by the petitioner or anyone else during polling hours and there was delay of seven days in lodging any complaint, the Appellate Division does not find any merit in this petition.
The Appellate Division observed that at the time of issuance of the Rule Nisi, the High Court Division on 08.01.2017 directed the Election Commission to publish the name of the writ-petitioner as elected Chairman in the official Gazette. That direction having not been stayed by Appellate Division, the name of the writ-petitioner, Md. Toufiqul Islam Toufiq, was published in the official Gazette as the elected Chairman of Word No. 13 Kamardaho Union Parishad. Particularly in view of the fact that no complaint was made by the petitioner or anyone else during polling hours and there was delay of seven days in lodging any complaint, the Appellate Division does not find any merit in this petition. the Appellate Division takes support from the view expressed in the case of Altaf Hossain vs Abul Kashem and others, 45 DLR (AD) 53, where it was observed that where allegation is brought after the declaration of the result then it is always desirable that dispute, if any, should go to the Tribunal for determination.
Syed Shariful Islam -Vs.- Md. Toufiqul Islam Toufiq and others. (Civil) 14 ALR (AD) 54-56 ....View Full Judgment