Act/Law wise: Judgment of Supreme Court of Bangladesh
Warrant of Precedence of 1975 |
Section/Order/Article/Rule/Regulation |
Head Note |
|
Civil awards holders and holders of gallantry awards of Bir Uttam should be
included in the Warrant of Precedence–
The Warrant of Precedence of the neighbouring countries include the holders
of highest civil awards, however the impugned Warrant of Precedence of our
country does not include such dignitaries, who are not constitutional or
public functionaries. As such, it is expected that those dignitaries who
have been honoured or decorated with civil awards, e.i., Shadhinata Padak,
or Ekhushey Padak, and those valiant freedom fighters who have been
honoured with gallantry awards of Bir Uttam should be included in the Table
of the impugned Warrant of Precedence in such order as deemed appropriate.
.....Bangladesh =VS= Md. Ataur Rahman, (Civil), 2018 (1) [4 LM (AD) 40] ....View Full Judgment
|
|
The impugned Warrant of Precedence being based on utter irrationality and
arbitrariness is to be modified and amended in the following manner–
1) As the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, all constitutional
functionaries shall be placed first in order of priority in the Table of
the impugned Warrant of Precedence.
2) Members of judicial service holding the posts of District Judges or
equivalent posts of District Judges shall be placed at Serial No.16 in the
Table along with the Secretaries to the Government and equivalent public
servants in the service of the Republic.
3) Additional District Judges or holders of equivalent judicial posts shall
be placed at the serial number 17 immediately after the District Judges.
.....Bangladesh =VS= Md. Ataur Rahman, (Civil), 2018 (1) [4 LM (AD) 40] ....View Full Judgment
|